Weekly Update: August 11

Things have been SO INCREDIBLY BUSY around the office as we head into the final stretch of summer. Somehow, it’s already a third of the way through August – when did that happen? Public schools start next week! So, you’re getting a double-feature this week: two weeks’ worth of higher ed news in one place.

And boy did things get crazy!

BIGGEST COLLEGE-RELATED NEWS OF THE WEEK

DOJ Memo Redefines How Colleges Can Address Antidiscrimination Laws

On July 29, the Department of Justice issued updated guidance on how antidiscrimination laws must be interpreted and applied by various entities – including colleges and universities. Despite its sweeping scope, the move drew surprisingly little media attention. The memo goes beyond the parameters outlined in the 2023 Supreme Court decision on affirmative action and, in at least one instance, appears to directly contradict it.

The Court had previously allowed that race could be considered indirectly in admissions when linked to a personal quality – for example, awarding credit for a student’s courage in overcoming racial discrimination or for leadership shaped by cultural heritage. The DOJ memo takes a harder line, warning that “Overcoming Obstacles Narratives” and “Diversity Statements” may be “potentially unlawful” if they advantage applicants whose stories are inherently tied to protected characteristics. Just two days later, and on the eve of the 2025–26 Common App launch, the University of Virginia and several other schools removed all supplemental essays from their applications. Cornell University went further, retracting its published prompts mid-cycle, leaving many students mid-draft and scrambling for next steps.

White House Orders Greater Transparency in College Admissions

One week later, President Trump issued an August 7 memorandum directing the Department of Education to revamp and expand the federal Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). The stated goal: make admissions data more accessible and understandable for students and parents. More realistically, though, I would think that the primary goal is to ensure that institutions receiving federal aid are transparent about how they select students. Key measures include redesigning the IPEDS online portal, streamlining the data submission process, expanding reporting requirements starting in the 2025–26 school year, strengthening data accuracy checks, and imposing penalties on institutions that submit incomplete or inaccurate information.

Lawsuit Targets Elite Colleges’ Use of Early Decision to Inflate Costs

A federal class-action lawsuit filed in Massachusetts alleges that 32 elite universities – including Penn, Brown, Duke, and Columbia – along with several admissions organizations, have conspired to use binding Early Decision policies to limit competition and drive up tuition. The complaint argues that requiring students to commit before seeing financial-aid offers removes the ability to compare packages, disadvantaging price-sensitive families and favoring wealthier applicants. Plaintiffs are seeking damages and an end to binding ED practices. Boy, I try to stay neutral here but I would not be a happy camper if they got rid of ED. I also don’t think it’s fair to say that wealthier applicants are favored, because students with significant financial need also do quite well in the ED process – they are able to get estimates of their financial aid packages before they apply, and they can back out of the ED commitment, no questions asked, if the finances don’t work out. I do understand the frustration students feel when they can’t compare prices for merit aid, but choices have to be made.

Columbia’s $220M Settlement with Trump Administration Draws National Attention

Two weeks ago, Columbia University agreed to pay a $220 million fine to resolve allegations of antisemitism and discriminatory DEI practices – a deal that restores $1.3 billion in federal funding. Columbia has not admitted wrongdoing but has committed to strengthening protections against antisemitism and complying with antidiscrimination laws, according to NPR. The settlement also includes oversight by an independent monitor, a move some see as an encroachment on higher ed independence. Columbia leaders frame the decision as restoring academic freedom, and for current students and those arriving this fall, the resolution is at least a relief that their federal funding is secure.

Barnard’s Settlement and Layoffs

Columbia-affiliated Barnard College also reached a settlement – this one stemming from a lawsuit brought by Jewish students and nonprofits. The agreement bans mask-wearing on campus, creates a Title VI coordinator role to ensure compliance with antidiscrimination laws, and cuts all ties to the Columbia University Apartheid Divest protest group. Shortly after, Barnard announced the layoff of 77 staff members in a “restructuring” effort. While faculty and administrators were spared, the move raises concerns about the financial health of the women’s liberal arts college.

Northern Virginia Schools to Comply with Title IX

At the end of July, the Department of Education ruled that five Northern Virginia school districts – Alexandria, Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun, and Prince William – are in violation of Title IX because they’ve been allowing transgender students to use restrooms and other intimate spaces that align with their gender identity rather than their biological sex. The districts were initially given 10 days to comply with a federal resolution that would force them to roll back those inclusive policies and adopt language that defines sex strictly as male or female based on biology. If they don’t comply, the Department of Justice could step in with enforcement.
Update: As of this week, the districts have been granted an extension to August 15 to respond and determine next steps. Closed-door meetings have been underway, and community voices – especially those of students – have been front and center. At DCCC, we believe every student deserves to feel safe and respected at school, no matter their identity. We hope these districts can uphold inclusive values while navigating the legal pressure ahead.

BEST ARTICLES OF THE WEEK

Above, we shared news about Columbia University’s settlement with the presidential administration, noting that reactions have been mixed. The New York Times dove deeper into why: while Columbia insists it struck a balance between upholding its principles and complying with the law, many in higher ed worry it signals a dangerous precedent — one where political interference in research and teaching starts to feel “normal.” Columbia lit professor Joseph R. Slaughter summed up the academic concern perfectly. Meanwhile, some in the Jewish community see the administration’s aggressive posture toward Columbia as more political than protective. But with $1.3 billion in federal funding at risk, many faculty and students felt settling was about survival.

The settlement has emboldened the administration to pursue similar deals with other schools, including Cornell, Duke, Northwestern, Brown — and especially Harvard. Harvard has so far refused to budge, even suing the administration, and its new president, Alan Garber, is widely respected for balancing a willingness to hear all sides with a firm hand on core principles. As one colleague put it, “Even people who disagree with Alan both trust and admire him… It’s his superpower.”

In another deeply reported piece, the Times looked at the President’s new requirement for colleges to disclose detailed admissions data — including race, gender, test scores, and GPAs for both accepted and rejected applicants. Supporters say it could expose hidden discrimination; critics worry about how the data might be used. But there’s a big wrinkle: nearly everyone at the National Center for Education Statistics — the very agency that would collect and analyze the data — has been fired. Out of about 100 employees, just four remain. Without the statisticians who ensured accuracy and comparability, some fear the data could be unreliable, or worse, selectively interpreted. As one union leader put it, “When you fire the professionals… that allows you to make up whatever facts you want.”

And if all this back-and-forth between government and higher ed has you craving a mental break, The Atlantic has a great list of books exploring what’s really at stake for universities — from their role in local economies to the value of pure research — plus a reminder that higher ed was never meant to be just job training (though landing a good job is a nice perk). Or skip the politics entirely and read this fun piece about Drexel senior RJ Smith, who’s running a Michelin-inspired Afro-Caribbean supper club from his dorm. While we can’t promise most college students cooking at this level, we posted a couple weeks ago about some schools where good eats are a part of the culture. Campus dining has definitely come a long way!

OFFICE HAPPENINGS

August 1 has come and gone, and with it, the floodgates have opened — all those long-awaited supplemental essays are finally here! The good news? These usually come together very quickly, since we’ve been putting in the groundwork for months, fine-tuning the generic supplementals so everyone’s ready to hit the ground running the moment prompts drop!

That prep pays off big time when schools decide to pile on the extras (looking at you, Northwestern and Virginia Tech). Now it’s just a matter of tailoring and polishing — which means we can keep momentum high without losing too much sleep.

And while we’re still stuck with summer heat and humidity in the DMV this week, we’ve had a few less oppressive mornings. If you can, sneak in a walk or a coffee outdoors before the afternoons turn steamy again — essay season is in full swing, but a little sunshine never hurts.

Weekly Update: June 13

It’s an exciting time at DCCC as many of our clients have just finished their high school classes, and for others, there are only a few more days to go! ☀️☀️☀️ While we know it’s important to enjoy that hard-earned rest, it’s also time to book some more appointments and make progress on those college application materials! Our coaches are looking forward to spending a lot more time working directly with your students on their essays. (And also taking some vacations … when there’s time!)

BIGGEST COLLEGE-RELATED NEWS OF THE WEEK

Major Change at Indiana’s Kelley School of Business

Incoming pre-business students at Indiana University received a welcome email this past week that came with an unexpected twist: the Kelley School of Business changed its internal admissions requirements. Not exactly the kind of thing you want to find out a month after you committed to attending the school! At IU, pre-business students enrolled with the expectation that they will be able to transfer into Kelley as long as they meet the standard admission criteria: a 3.5 GPA with some flexibility in individual course grades.

But beginning with the Class of 2029, students must now earn a B+ or higher in every single class during their first year at IU Bloomington to gain guaranteed admission to Kelley. This is a major shift in policy. While the announcement frames the change as a commitment to academic excellence and student support, it’s landing poorly with many families and counselors. We love Kelley and think it provides a phenomenal education, but this kind of midstream policy change raises serious questions about transparency and fairness.

Note: Just before publishing this post, we noticed that Kelley’s website now includes an updated list of admissions requirements for students admitted to the Summer 2025 semester or later. However, this updated list does not match up with the information provided in the letter. Very strange!

College Athletes Are Finally Getting Paid!

In the landmark settlement House v. NCAA, U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken gave the final go-ahead to revise a model that has, for over a century, prevented college athletes from getting paid directly by their schools. Starting July 1, colleges can share up to $20.5 million of their revenues with the actual athletes who are filling their stadiums, not only providing much-needed rights for student athletes but also helping to avoid some of the shady third-party dealings that were approved in 2021. Better still: the $2.8 billion settlement means that schools will be able to offer back payments for athletes who competed between 2016 and 2024! While the bulk of the money will be going to student-athletes in the highest revenue-earning sports – namely, football, this is a major win for athletes in all NCAA sports. On the flip side, others worry that this move could change the nature of college sports altogether, blurring the line between student-athletes and professionals. We can definitely see both sides!

Travel Bans Worry International Students

On June 4, President Trump announced plans to ban travel to the U.S. from 12 countries, including Iran, Somalia, and Sudan – countries from which many visa-holding students have come to the U.S. for their college education. As summer vacation starts at colleges and universities, many international students are anxious about leaving the U.S. to see their families, fearing they won’t be permitted to re-enter the country. Others already abroad rushed to try and make it back before the enforcement of the ban, which began Monday, June 9. According to the Washington Post, over “24,000 international students from the affected countries studied in the U.S. as recently as the 2023-2024 academic year,” so it’s not merely a handful of students who are impacted. Here at DCCC, our hearts go out to all the college students and their families worrying about their futures as a result of these recent restrictions.

A Different Kind of Legacy Admission in California

While the Supreme Court overturned affirmative action policies in 2023, the state of California is still fighting to provide opportunities for students who can prove they are directly descended from U.S. slaves. The goal of the bill is to address structural racism by allowing students who can prove that they have slave ancestors, regardless of their race or color. The bill, AB7, passed the State Assembly and will now be considered by the State Senate. If it passes there as well, it is sure to spark larger debate and could even reach the Supreme Court, as it continues to reinforce the divide between those who think colleges should offer reparations for historical injustices versus those who reject the idea of race-based special preferences.

Will Columbia Lose Accreditation?

As the Trump administration continues to target higher education, Columbia University remains (alongside Harvard) in the crosshairs. The Department of Education is trying to get Columbia’s accreditation status revoked, citing anti-semitism and a violation of anti-discrimination laws. However, accreditation is provided by federally-approved third-party groups, so there is no guarantee the president’s push to have this crucial status removed will move forward. Still, it’s a source of major concern as accreditation is required for federal student loan eligibility, federal grants, and even for credits to transfer or carry forward to graduate education at other colleges and universities. We’ll be watching this issue closely at DCCC as it could very seriously impact admissions and student aid at a school where many of our clients have sought (and gained!) acceptance in the past.

BEST ARTICLES OF THE WEEK

This week, I wanted to start by addressing a question I’m asked all the time: is it better to send my child to private school or public school?

There’s no one right way to answer that question, as there are many different factors involved: how much will it cost? Which private schools are you considering? Which opportunities do public schools have in your area? While our team can advise people on a one-to-one basis, I think this short video from Scott Galloway (public speaker and professor of marketing at NYU’s Stern School of Business) sums it up really well: in many ways, it’s more beneficial to save and invest the money you would have spent on private education. Your local teachers could be really great, and it’s not too difficult to fill in any education gaps. I would still say the decision should be made on an individual basis, because there are many nuances that affect individual situations. In a general sense, though, his advice here is on point, and the video is worth a watch for any families considering this decision.

Of course, if your child isn’t getting enough sleep, they won’t be doing very well in their classes regardless of which type of school they attend! It can be hard to tell if your emotionally-volatile teenager is sleep-deprived or just … well … acting like a teenager, but one school in Ohio is offering classes on improving sleep! Studies show that our kids just aren’t sleeping enough. As the article explains, many are getting 3-4 fewer hours per night than needed. It even suggests that the rise in mental health concerns among teenagers could at least partially result from sleep deprivation and its impacts on the brain. Other factors are involved, of course, but I wouldn’t risk blaming everything on social media if you know your teen is only clocking 5 hours per night! So it might be time to consider implementing better sleep habits for your teens, especially as we move into summer when sports, internships, and social activities are a constant – we want those minds sharp for writing college application essays!

Once your child is accepted to the college of their dreams, sleep deprivation won’t be the only problem! Uncomfortable interactions with other students on campus can also lead to major concerns, which is why most schools offer “No Contact Orders,” or NCOs. Initially designed to help with instances of sexual misconduct, NCOs ensure that both parties in a dispute avoid each other to prevent further escalation – which is especially helpful if there is a legal concern involved. However, according to the Wall Street Journal, there has been a significant rise in the use of NCOs on campus in recent years, in part due to Gen Z’s challenges in navigating interpersonal challenges. The article discusses some really absurd cases, such as a student requesting a NCO for her roommate after an accusation of stealing bagels! And many of these NCOs are being served as a direct result of parental involvement. 

Unfortunately, they’re being dished out so frequently that they can lead to as much harm as good, since they can “leave students vulnerable and violate due process.” For instance, the article discusses a student with ADHD who was served an NCO by a female classmate he didn’t even know – she mistook his symptoms as stalking, and he spiraled into anxiety as a result. We’re raising a generation taught to block anyone they don’t like on social media, one that was deprived of the chance to learn the complexities of social engagement thanks to the pandemic. Before we send them away, let’s see what we can do to give them the skills they need to resolve conflicts in a healthy manner … or at least to determine if a situation is bad enough to call for an NCO!

Finally, let’s circle back to Indiana University, where some administrative and organizational changes are causing a stir. In accordance with the Trump administration’s attempt to impose sweeping changes at colleges and universities across the country, Republicans in Indiana passed a new law that limits the voice of tenured faculty in public university decision-making, gives the state’s governor power over the IU governing board, and eliminates degree programs with too few students, primarily those in the humanities. IU Bloomington is known for its strong arts and humanities programs, which is one of several reasons many are concerned about these changes. Meanwhile, IU’s president, Dr. Pamela Whitten, has calmly accepted this legislation, leading many faculty to publicly condemn her silence. Additionally, Indiana’s public universities are facing 5% in budget cuts over the next 2 years. I am sure IU will remain a highly regarded school for many reasons, but before committing yourself to becoming a Hoosier, you should definitely keep an eye on some of these changes in case they impact your degree program.

OFFICE HAPPENINGS

The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) process is definitely challenging to navigate, and we have worked with families over the years to figure out how to align a student’s IEP goals with their college admissions search and application process. However, even just securing the IEP itself can be a huge obstacle for many families.

Fortunately, the Parent Educational Advocacy Training Center (PEATC), in collaboration with the Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) regularly offers a free, self-paced course to help parents better understand this process – there’s even a certification of completion at the end.

“IEP University” is something I would highly recommend to any of our parents with students who have IEPs, and I’ll even be taking it myself so I can get a handle on some best practices and strategies for productive IEP meetings. While the June class has already started, you still have until June 29 at 11:45 pm EDT to complete the course. If this is relevant to you, register here. 

Have a great weekend!

Interested in Other Higher Ed News? Check Out the Posts Below: