Well, this summer is certainly keeping us on our toes. Just as we finally escaped the heat dome, many of us woke up this weekend to smoky skies from the Canadian wildfires. We hope everyone stayed safe and limited their time outdoors (another reason we love air conditioning). And we’re certainly wishing the best to the communities in Canada dealing with the fires themselves. Hopefully, it will finally be safe to spend more time outside this week; I’m starting to forget what summer is supposed to feel like. So here’s hoping for clearer skies – and less humidity – before summer decides to throw us its next surprise.
And now, let’s get into this week’s higher-ed news:
BIGGEST COLLEGE-RELATED NEWS OF THE WEEK
STANDARDIZED TESTING AT UC REMAINS A QUESTION MARK
It feels like we’ve been talking about standardized testing every week lately… and you’re right. As more colleges reconsider test-optional and test-blind admissions policies, the University of California system continues to make headlines, only this time by hitting the pause button on the question. An influential UC admissions committee unexpectedly suspended its previously announced timeline for evaluating whether SAT or ACT scores should once again play a role in admissions. UC's admissions committee unexpectedly suspended its original timeline for reconsidering standardized testing, although university officials have emphasized that the review itself is still moving forward. The Regents continue to expect a recommendation by June 2027. Despite the delay, UC Regents have indicated that they still expect a recommendation by next year, meaning the debate over standardized testing at UC is far from over.
For students applying over the next few admissions cycles, nothing changes for now – UC campuses will remain test-free. But as with every other story on the topic this year, it serves as a reminder to keep an eye on testing policies at colleges on your list, as things could change quickly.
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW GOES “OLD SCHOOL”
As faculty across the country continue to struggle with the increasing reliance on AI among students, the University of Chicago Law School is taking an old-fashioned approach to this very modern problem. Beginning this fall, first-year law students will be prohibited from using laptops, phones, or AI during their required core classes, with limited exceptions. Instead, they’ll rely on handwritten notes, in-class discussions, and exams without access to electronic resources. The school will also incorporate responsible AI use into its legal research and writing curriculum. While this is just one university law school, it’s likely that faculty at many universities will start to implement similar measures in their attempts to ensure students are relying on themselves rather than external tools and LLMs.
RECORD GPA INVITES CONCERNS ABOUT STANDARDIZING GRADE WEIGHTING
A Florida student made headlines this week after graduating with a staggering 11.99 weighted GPA, the result of taking an extraordinary number of AP and dual-enrollment courses. His achievement was so unusual that his school district has since overhauled its GPA calculation system, adopting instead a standardized 5.0 scale to reduce student stress and bring its grading practices more in line with those used by colleges nationwide. Perhaps most interestingly, the student himself supported the change, pointing out that the colleges already recalculate GPAs using their own methods anyway.
The story is also a helpful reminder for families not to obsess over tiny differences in GPA. Admissions offices know that a 4.17 at one high school may not mean the same thing as a 4.39 at another. Rather than comparing students by tenths or hundredths of a point, colleges look more closely at the rigor of the courses available to you, the classes you chose to take, and how well you performed in them. In other words, focus on building the strongest transcript you reasonably can rather than trying to accrue every possible decimal point. Of course, that doesn't mean piling on every AP course available. Colleges want to see students challenge themselves academically, but not at the expense of their well-being or meaningful extracurricular involvement.
JMU INVESTING HEAVILY IN HEALTHCARE
Thanks to nearly $150 million in Virginia state funding, James Madison University will expand its College of Health and Behavioral Studies with a new six-story addition featuring nursing teaching labs, physician assistant classrooms, community clinics, research space, and collaborative learning areas. The funding will also support the university’s accelerated FastFlex nursing pathway and renovations to Johnston Hall, allowing JMU to educate more healthcare professionals while helping address workforce shortages across Virginia. Construction is expected to begin next year, with the new facility opening in 2029. For our students interested in nursing, physician assistant studies, psychology, kinesiology, public health, or related fields, this is a good reason to add or keep JMU on your list! And the story is also an important reminder when researching colleges not just to look at a university’s current facilities – pay attention to new investments and future opportunities as they often signal what programs are likely to grow over the next several years.
BEST ARTICLES OF THE WEEK
Four of this week’s best articles all point towards the same question: as higher education continues to change, how do colleges, graduate schools, and employers decide what academic excellence really looks like? Between grade inflation, AI, and the rapidly changing reputations of colleges themselves, the answer may be becoming more complicated than ever.
In an opinion piece from The New York Times, journalist and Duke University faculty member Frank Bruni explores the growing problem of grade inflation at many elite colleges. According to Bruni, grades have become so inflated that professors often feel pressured to award more A’s because students worry that even an A- or B+ could hurt their chances of admission to competitive graduate programs, including medical or law school. And the issue is systemic; as Bruni writes, “There’s no punishment, only reward, for being the kindly professor with a goody bag of easy A’s.” So as GPAs become less useful for distinguishing students, grad schools and employers may start placing greater emphasis on the rigor of a student’s college, the courses they chose, and other accomplishments like research and internships. It’s a great reminder that while earning strong grades is still important, they are only a piece of a much larger picture.
And it’s not just a lack of university incentives for grading more strictly that is the problem; as the Washington Post points out, it’s simply getting harder to assess student work at all as generative AI tools become increasingly sophisticated. If you were reading the blog last week (or regularly receive news about higher ed on social media), you know about the professor at Brown who required an in-class exam after suspecting his students were using AI when he initially assigned a take-home version. His experience speaks to a larger concern: “students are going to be using AI, whether you know about it or not.” As a result, many professors are redesigning assignments, requiring more in-class writing, and creating project-based work that better demonstrates students’ own thinking. (Our essay coach and UMD faculty member Dr. Alan Montroso can confirm this is exactly the work that he and his colleagues are doing right now as they revise their fall syllabi). A college education is about so much more than grades: it’s about developing genuine critical thinking and communication skills that remain valuable no matter how technology evolves, and universities will adapt to ensure those skills are being learned.
The question of evaluating students also applies to applicants, as some colleges are rethinking the role of supplemental essays in the admissions process altogether. The Wall Street Journal reports that institutions including Tulane, Washington University in St. Louis, and UNC Chapel Hill have reduced or eliminated some supplemental essay requirements, citing concerns about AI-generated writing and a desire to make the application process less burdensome for students. Of course, they also benefit from this change: fewer required essays also make it easier for students to apply to more colleges, often driving application numbers, and thus selectivity numbers too, even higher. But even as some colleges eliminate supplemental essays, those that still require them offer students an important opportunity to stand out through thoughtful, authentic responses. Strong supplemental essays remain one of the best opportunities to show admissions officers who you are beyond your transcript.
And as these changes to evaluation and admission underscore, adaptation is simply a part of the higher educational landscape. And often these kinds of changes can completely revamp a college and its reputation. New York Magazine explores Vanderbilt University’s own evolution from a respected regional institution into one of the most selective universities in the country. In fact, Vanderbilt's acceptance rate for the Class of 2030 was just 4.6%, putting it in the same extraordinarily selective territory as Yale. As the article explains, that didn’t happen by accident. Successive university leaders invested heavily in recruiting top students nationwide, strengthening research, expanding financial aid, and improving campus life – occasionally to the irritation of some students:
‘“They’re always either tearing something down or building something new,” Jade McDaniel, a sixth-year Ph.D. student in biomedical sciences, complained to me — but the core of the university’s campus remains unchanged: charming grass lawns crisscrossed by paths leading from one stately redbrick building to another.”
They’ve also focused on building a more geographically and economically diverse student body; today, students come from all 50 states and more than 100 countries. Today, “Vandy” – as students and alumni affectionately call it – has become a fixture on many college lists alongside the Ivies. So many of our students dream of attending Vanderbilt, and they should keep in mind that it is basically just as difficult to get into as the Ivies on those lists! It’s important to remember that colleges can change drastically over time; when researching schools, families shouldn’t rely on reputations built ten or twenty years ago, but instead look carefully at what each institution offers today.
OFFICE HAPPENINGS
We are deep in supplemental essay season right now, with client meetings filling our coaches’ schedules in order to make headway on what can feel like a very lengthy process, depending on the number of schools to which they are applying. Keep in mind that, while we use our Generic Supplemental Essays to speed up this process, there is still a lot of research and independent drafting that needs to take place between the meetings. The work now is tailoring those essays to the specific language of the individual university prompts – or creating wholly new ones for some of those oddball questions (we see you, Chicago…). We recommend carving out an additional hour or two between essay coaching meetings to get that work done so that you can hit the ground running when you meet. Those meetings are often best spent brainstorming, outlining, and revising, rather than silently drafting.
Enjoy the weather this week!
